The facilitator, namely the natural person, also belonging to the same work context as the whistleblower, who assists by providing support and/or advice in the reporting process (e.g., a colleague in the office).
Individuals within the same work context as the whistleblower (or the discloser of information), meaning people connected by a network of relationships arising from the fact that they operate, or have operated in the past, in the same work environment and have a stable emotional bond with him (e.g., cohabitant) or a relationship of kinship within the fourth degree.
Colleagues of the whistleblower (or the discloser of information) who work in the same work context, meaning their employment relationship has not ceased, and who have a habitual and ongoing relationship with him. This implies a relationship that is not merely sporadic, occasional, episodic, or exceptional but is current, prolonged over time, and with a continuity sufficient to establish a relationship of camaraderie/friendship.
Entities exclusively or partially owned, provided it is a majority stake, by the whistleblower (or the discloser of information) or those for whom the same works, and entities operating in the same work context as such individuals.
vsdvs
Offenses falling within the scope of EU or national legislation related to the following sectors: public procurement; services, products, and financial markets, and prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing; product safety and compliance; transport safety; environmental protection; radiation protection and nuclear safety; food and feed safety and animal health and welfare; public health; consumer protection; privacy and personal data protection, and security of networks and information systems.
Acts or omissions harming the financial interests of the Union.
Acts or omissions concerning the internal market.
Acts or behaviors that undermine the purpose or objectives of the provisions in EU legislation.
Additionally, any retaliations suffered can also be communicated to ANAC.
A report, however, cannot concern information that is blatantly unfounded or pertains to information already entirely in the public domain or is based on solely unreliable rumors or speculations (e.g., hearsay or rumors).
As for expressly excluded contents:
Disputes, claims, or requests related to a personal interest solely pertaining to individual employment or work relationships, including relationships with hierarchically superior figures.
Reports of violations already mandatorily regulated by other legal sources that already guarantee specific reporting procedures.
Reports of violations related to national security, as well as contracts related to defense or national security aspects, unless such aspects fall within the relevant EU derived law.
It is explicitly stated that the legislation under discussion does not prejudice the application of national and European provisions on: classified information; medical or forensic professional secrecy; confidentiality of deliberations of judicial bodies; rules of criminal procedure; autonomy and independence of the judiciary; national defense and public order and security; exercise of workers' rights.
Finally, it is noted that the reasons that prompted the individual to make a report are irrelevant for the handling of the report and the protection of the reporting party.
6. WHAT IS THE MINIMUM CONTENT OF A REPORT?
In general, a report must be as detailed as possible. In summary, it is necessary for the following to be clear:
The personal details of the reporting party.
The time and place in which the reported incident occurred.
To ensure an adequate level of completeness and to facilitate investigative activities, it is advisable for the reporting party to attach any documents that may provide evidence of the reported facts, as well as to provide information about other individuals potentially aware of the facts.
In any case, if necessary, the party handling the reports will proceed to request additional information.
The entity responsible for managing whistleblowing reports, within 7 days of receiving the report or meeting request, sends a receipt acknowledgment to the reporting party, acknowledging receipt of the report and initiating the handling process, or communicates the date, time, and location of the meeting. The only reports that do not receive a receipt acknowledgment are those received during the meeting.
Following the receipt, there is an assessment of the admissibility/procedural/receivability requirements of the report. If the outcome is negative, the report will not proceed further. Otherwise, the investigative phase begins.
The reporting party will receive a final response, indicating the measures taken or to be taken, the reasons for the decision, and any other necessary information, within 3 months from the date of the receipt acknowledgment or, in the absence of such acknowledgment, within 3 months from the expiration of the 7-day period from the submission of the report.
The individuals described above can also report to ANAC (exclusively to this Authority) any retaliations they believe they have suffered due to the report, disclosure, or public dissemination made.
To use the external communication channel to ANAC and for further clarification about the characteristics and details of this channel, the procedure, and the prerequisites for making the report, please refer to the tools and explanations provided at the following link, which directly leads to the institutional website of the National Anti-Corruption Authority: https://www.anticorruzione.it/-/whistleblowing.
Below is the link to directly access the platform for making a report to ANAC: https://whistleblowing.anticorruzione.it/#/.
The reporting party, after making an internal report without receiving a response within the specified timeframe, has made an external report to ANAC and has not received a response within a reasonable timeframe.
The reporting party has made an external report to ANAC and has not received a response regarding the measures taken or planned to follow up on the report within a reasonable timeframe.
The individual has valid reasons to believe, reasonably and based on concrete circumstances (not mere speculation), that the violation may represent an imminent or obvious danger to public interest.
The individual has valid reasons to believe that making an external report to ANAC may pose the risk of retaliation or may not have an effective follow-up.
The individual making a public disclosure should consider themselves distinct from the source of information for journalists. The Legislature has provided the opportunity for individuals to directly approach the competent judicial authorities. In this case as well, individuals enjoy the protections provided by the aforementioned Decree.
Regarding individuals with the status of a public official or a person in charge of public service, making an internal or external report does not exempt them from complying with the provisions of Articles 361 c.p., 362 c.p., and 331 c.p.p.
The protection system is structured to include:
Protection of the confidentiality of the identity of the reporting party, the facilitator, the person or persons indicated as possible perpetrators of the reported conduct, any other individuals named in the report or attached documents, as well as anyone involved in the procedure and events reported.
Limitations of liability regarding the disclosure and dissemination of certain categories of information (e.g., information protected by copyright law, data protected by privacy regulations, etc.) that operate under certain conditions.
Here is a merely illustrative list of what could be considered retaliation: dismissal, suspension, or equivalent measures; demotion or failure to promote; change of functions, change of workplace, salary reduction, modification of working hours; suspension of training or any restriction of access to it; negative performance reviews or negative references; imposition of disciplinary measures or other sanctions, including financial ones; coercion, intimidation, harassment, or ostracism; discrimination or any unfavorable treatment; failure to convert a fixed-term employment contract into an indefinite-term contract, where the worker has a legitimate expectation for such conversion; non-renewal or early termination of a fixed-term employment contract; damages, including to the person's reputation, especially on social media, or economic or financial prejudice, including loss of economic opportunities and loss of income; inclusion in inappropriate lists based on a formal or informal sectoral or industrial agreement, which may make it impossible for the person to find employment in the sector or industry in the future; early termination or cancellation of a supply contract for goods or services; cancellation of a license or permit.
Support measures are provided in the form of information, assistance, and consultations free of charge on reporting methods and protection from retaliation offered by national and European Union legislative provisions, on the rights of the involved person, as well as on the methods and conditions for access to legal representation at the state's expense. A list of third-sector entities that provide support measures to reporting individuals is established at ANAC.